Order Flow Meets Smart Money Concepts

Order flow traders and Smart Money Concept (SMC) traders often talk past each other, even though they’re reading the same market behavior under different names. In this webinar, Sebastian Saupe of TwinPeaks trade+educate set out to close that gap.

Saupe, founder of the futures trading education platform TwinPeaks trade+educate, showed how core order flow concepts map onto SMC vocabulary. He then took it live on a NinjaTrader chart to show the order flow underneath real fair value gaps and supply and demand zones. His starting point: these ideas all rest on the fact that large buyers and sellers need time to place their orders. Once they’ve built their positions, they can drive the big moves retail traders chase.

One market, two vocabularies

Saupe approached the SMC buzzwords through an order flow lens. The session pairs four terms side by side:

• Absorption and order block
• Delta imbalance and fair value gap
• High-volume node and supply/demand zone
• Liquidity pool and liquidity sweep

In the live walkthrough, he focused on two of those pairs: fair value gaps (with imbalances), and supply and demand zones.

Fair value gaps and imbalances

An imbalance, Saupe explained, is when one side of the order book is significantly larger than the other. He pointed to one bar showing 149 to 2. It signals a fast move: few limit orders sit at those prices, and the market runs through them, so not everyone who wants to enter or exit there gets filled. In his footprint, a level counts as an imbalance when one side is at least three times larger than the other, and stacked imbalances on a small timeframe work like a fair value gap.

A fair value gap is the SMC version of the same idea. After a stretch of consolidation and short bars, a strong move runs so fast that not all trading intent can be filled, and some traders prefer to wait for the move before entering. Saupe likes the 15-minute (M15) chart for marking them. When price closes through a gap and breaks it, it becomes an inverse fair value gap, which he noted is a common system to trade without a footprint.

Adding a footprint brings in the order flow detail. His chart shows bid and ask volume per bar, along with the value area high and low, the volume point of control (VPOC, the price level with the most volume), volume-weighted average price (VWAP), and the volume profile. A level needs a reaction, he said, much like a support or resistance zone.

A failed retest

In one example, price broke a level with strong stacked imbalances, then pulled back to retest it. The old imbalance level now worked like a fair value gap on a smaller timeframe. Buyers showed up, including a single print of 1,083 contracts, but there were so many sellers that the buyers couldn’t push the market higher. Saupe calls them trapped buyers: plenty of buying near the high with no ability to lift the market. He read that exhaustion (i.e., no more interest at the price level) as a cue to look for shorts, not longs, once confirmation appears.

Imbalances as targets

In a midday example, price ran straight through VWAP without long wicks or heavy volume at the bottom, leaving imbalances unfilled behind it. In Saupe’s view, unfilled imbalances give price a good chance of returning, which makes them a potential target after a break and retest.

Volume-based levels such as VPOC, VWAP, and value areas also work well as targets in the E-mini S&P 500 (ES), he said. The formulas are the same in every order flow software, so the levels are global, and traders in a position can end up exiting there.

Supply and demand zones

On a one-minute (M1) ES chart, Saupe starts with supply and demand zones. A strong move needs volume and capital behind it, so he looks at where a significant move began: a spot where price stays for a few minutes, building volume and transactions, before the large participants finish their business and start the move. Demand zones are where buyers intend to push the market up, and supply zones are where sellers intend to sell.

He showed this with a drop in the Asia session. Price dropped, consolidated, and dropped again, and those consolidation levels became zones where buyers waiting with limit and iceberg orders could absorb the sellers coming from above. The tell on a small chart (10-second or one-minute) is time: price stays in a small area while the volume gets done, followed by a strong move that shows up as an imbalance or fair value gap on a smaller timeframe.

These zones don’t expire in minutes. Saupe said they can last for hours, even days, as long as they aren’t broken. The levels he trades most are inverted ones: a strong move, a dynamic break through a zone, a pullback, and confirmation before he looks for the next leg.

Putting both on a live chart

Saupe’s daily layout is an M5 chart with a footprint, fair value gaps from an M15 chart, and an M1 chart for structure and reactions. He uses his Zone Finder indicator to mark the gaps and the Zone Finder Duplicator to display M15 zones on the M5 chart, alongside the SidiFootprint indicator.

In a setup from his own trading that day, an M15 fair value gap showed up on the M5 chart as a zone full of imbalances and thin volume. Price dropped and traded heavy volume (nearly 4,000 contracts at one level), then ran back up into the zone. Saupe waited for confirmation: absorption first, then exhaustion at the top, with the day’s VPOC shifting down and sell imbalances appearing. His reasoning was that sellers who’d driven price down with strong delta wouldn’t be happy to see it rise that fast, and would want lower prices to get out. A move back toward the VPOC, the price with the most interest, was the idea. He added that what counts as a good signal depends on each trader’s style (e.g., footprint or breakout trading), and that he didn’t want to give advice.

He also asked traders to think like a large hedge fund. A fund looking for a discount doesn’t buy at the current price; it buys below the last low. At the low in his example, he saw absorption: strong selling that couldn’t push the market down, which he attributed to iceberg orders, synthetic market orders, and algorithms soaking up the sell orders, while the value area shifted lower. Positive imbalances followed, along with a reaction at an M1 demand zone.

Without structure, Saupe said, trading is like driving with two small holes in the windshield. The reactions at these zones aren’t gambling; they’re planned areas for entries and exits.

Keep the chart simple

The most common issue Saupe sees in order flow trading is too much information on the chart. “Your chart looks like a space station,” he said. He prefers a structured layout built on information many traders see: a bid-ask footprint, a session volume profile, and structure such as supply and demand zones, order blocks, and fair value gaps. Bid-ask is the best way to view the footprint for him, though delta colors or a second footprint are easy to add.

In his opinion, the most traded charts are M15, M5, and M1, and he thinks three charts can cover 80 to 90% of markets. He’s used this setup for over eight years.

Four takeaways

Saupe closed with four takeaways:

• Mark zones as areas, not single levels, using a rectangle or highlight tool.
• Read the reaction. Watch for aggression, such as high volume, strong buyers or sellers, exhaustion, or absorption (a lot of volume with price barely moving). He estimated it takes four to six weeks of one to two hours a day watching the market to build a feel for it.
• Define the invalidation before the trade. He suggests saying the plan out loud: what would make the trade valid, and what would make the idea wrong.
• Plan ahead and trade less. He sees community members making 80 to 100 trades a day and says two to four is fine.

Watch the full session

The recording includes Saupe’s full chart walkthrough of fair value gaps, supply and demand zones, and the order flow behind each. Watch the full session on YouTube.

How to Add 3rd Party App to NinjaTrader

To import your 3rd party app or add-on to NinjaTrader, simply follow these 3 steps: